How we scoreBlogAdvertise
html›body›main#compare1,338 models · updated Nov 10, 2026
  1. compoundsemi.com
  2. Compare
  3. WT16R vs P7 Core

Fenix WT16R vs Ledlenser P7 Core

What WT16R does better (3) and where P7 Core wins (3) — every spec side by side.

Fenix WT16R
Fenix · 2021WT16R
4.4Score
3 advantages≈ $65
vs
Ledlenser P7 Core
Ledlenser · 2020P7 Core
4.9Score
3 advantages≈ $55
Higher score
2.9Brightness & throw4.9
5.1Battery & charging2.9
4.1Build & durability4.3
2.6Light quality5.6

Why is WT16R better than P7 Core?

  1. Weight129 g vs 177 g+37%
  2. RechargeableYes · P7 Core: No
  3. Maximum runtime30 h vs 25 h+20%

Why is P7 Core better than WT16R?

  1. Beam distance (ANSI FL1)115 m vs 300 m2.6×
  2. Maximum output300 lm vs 450 lm+50%
  3. Water protection (IPx)IPx4 vs IPx5+25%
Specifications

Side by side

Fenix WT16RFenix WT16R≈ $654.4
Light output
Maximum output300 lm450 lm
Peak beam intensity3,310 cd—
Beam distance (ANSI FL1)115 m300 m
Light sourceLEDLED
Adjustable focus (zoom)—Yes
LED & beam
LED emitterCree XP-E2—
LED makerCree—
Number of LEDs2—
Colour temperature5,800K—
Battery & charging
BatteryBuilt-in Li-ion / Li-PoAAA
Maximum runtime30 h25 h
RechargeableYesNo
USB-C chargingYes—
Battery level indicatorYes—
Build & durability
Protection ratingIP66IPX5
Water protection (IPx)IPx4IPx5
Body material—Aluminium
Pocket clipYes—
Size & weight
Length / height127 mm130 mm
Head diameter / width37 mm—
Body diameter / depth26 mm—
Weight129 g177 g
Modes & features
Brightness levels3—
Mode memoryYes—
ColoursBlackBlack
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare