- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- WT25R vs MH10 V2.0
Fenix WT25R vs Nitecore MH10 V2.0
What WT25R does better (0) and where MH10 V2.0 wins (4) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
WT25RMH10 V2.0
| WT25R | MH10 V2.0 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length / height | 135.3 mm | 130 mm | +5.3 mm |
| Head diameter / width | 29 mm | 25 mm | +4 mm |
| Weight | 137 g | 75 g | +62 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is WT25R better than MH10 V2.0?
WT25R has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Why is MH10 V2.0 better than WT25R?
- Maximum runtime29 h vs 520 h17.9×
- Water protection (IPx)IPx4 vs IPx82×
- Weight137 g vs 75 g+83%
- Beam distance (ANSI FL1)220 m vs 232 m+5%
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 1,000 lm | 1,000 lm |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 220 m | 232 m |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | Built-in Li-ion / Li-Po | 18650 Li-ion, CR123A |
| Number of batteries | 1 | — |
| Maximum runtime | 29 h | 520 h |
| Rechargeable | Yes | Yes |
| Build & durability | ||
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx4 | IPx8 |
| Submersible to | — | 2 m |
| Body material | — | Aluminium |
| Size & weight | ||
| Length / height | 135.3 mm | 130 mm |
| Head diameter / width | 29 mm | 25 mm |
| Weight | 137 g | 75 g |
| Modes & features | ||
| Strobe | Yes | Yes |
| SOS / beacon | Yes | Yes |
| Colours | Black | Black |
