- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- WT25R vs MH12 V2.0
Fenix WT25R vs Nitecore MH12 V2.0
What WT25R does better (1) and where MH12 V2.0 wins (3) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
WT25RMH12 V2.0
| WT25R | MH12 V2.0 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length / height | 135.3 mm | 158 mm | −22.7 mm |
| Head diameter / width | 29 mm | 25 mm | +4 mm |
| Weight | 137 g | 84 g | +53 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is WT25R better than MH12 V2.0?
- Beam distance (ANSI FL1)220 m vs 202 m+9%
Why is MH12 V2.0 better than WT25R?
- Maximum runtime29 h vs 1,500 h51.7×
- Weight137 g vs 84 g+63%
- Maximum output1,000 lm vs 1,200 lm+20%
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 1,000 lm | 1,200 lm |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 220 m | 202 m |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | Built-in Li-ion / Li-Po | Built-in Li-ion / Li-Po |
| Number of batteries | 1 | — |
| Maximum runtime | 29 h | 1,500 h |
| Rechargeable | Yes | Yes |
| Build & durability | ||
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx4 | — |
| Body material | — | Aluminium |
| Size & weight | ||
| Length / height | 135.3 mm | 158 mm |
| Head diameter / width | 29 mm | 25 mm |
| Weight | 137 g | 84 g |
| Modes & features | ||
| Strobe | Yes | — |
| SOS / beacon | Yes | — |
| Colours | Black | — |
