- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- ML25L vs E52C
Maglite ML25L vs Nextorch E52C
What ML25L does better (2) and where E52C wins (3) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
ML25LE52C
| ML25L | E52C | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length / height | 168 mm | 153 mm | +15 mm |
| Head diameter / width | 43 mm | 30 mm | +13 mm |
| Weight | 317 g | 130 g | +187 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is ML25L better than E52C?
- Beam distance (ANSI FL1)337 m vs 210 m+60%
- Maximum runtime72 h vs 65 h+11%
Why is E52C better than ML25L?
- Maximum output192 lm vs 3,000 lm15.6×
- Weight317 g vs 130 g2.4×
- Water protection (IPx)IPx4 vs IPx82×
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 192 lm | 3,000 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | — | 11,025 cd |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 337 m | 210 m |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | Built-in Li-ion / Li-Po | 21700 Li-ion |
| Maximum runtime | 72 h | 65 h |
| Rechargeable | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C charging | — | Yes |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | — | IPX8 |
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx4 | IPx8 |
| Body material | Aluminium | Aluminium |
| Pocket clip | — | Yes |
| Size & weight | ||
| Length / height | 168 mm | 153 mm |
| Head diameter / width | 43 mm | 30 mm |
| Weight | 317 g | 130 g |
| Modes & features | ||
| Colours | Black | — |
