- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- ML50LX 3-C-Cell vs MH10 V2.0
Maglite ML50LX 3-C-Cell vs Nitecore MH10 V2.0
What ML50LX 3-C-Cell does better (1) and where MH10 V2.0 wins (4) — every spec side by side.
vs
5.5Brightness & throw5.2
8.3Battery & charging9.7
2.7Build & durability8.7
Why is ML50LX 3-C-Cell better than MH10 V2.0?
- Beam distance (ANSI FL1)339 m vs 232 m+46%
Why is MH10 V2.0 better than ML50LX 3-C-Cell?
- Maximum runtime153 h vs 520 h3.4×
- Maximum output611 lm vs 1,000 lm+64%
- Water protection (IPx)IPx4 vs IPx82×
- RechargeableNo · ML50LX 3-C-Cell: Yes
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 611 lm | 1,000 lm |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 339 m | 232 m |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | C | 18650 Li-ion, CR123A |
| Number of batteries | 3 | — |
| Maximum runtime | 153 h | 520 h |
| Rechargeable | No | Yes |
| Build & durability | ||
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx4 | IPx8 |
| Submersible to | — | 2 m |
| Body material | Aluminium | Aluminium |
| Size & weight | ||
| Length / height | 260 mm | 130 mm |
| Head diameter / width | — | 25 mm |
| Weight | — | 75 g |
| Modes & features | ||
| Strobe | — | Yes |
| SOS / beacon | — | Yes |
| Colours | — | Black |
