- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- EOS 32LRZ vs R40
Mares EOS 32LRZ vs Seac R40
What EOS 32LRZ does better (1) and where R40 wins (1) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
EOS 32LRZR40
| EOS 32LRZ | R40 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length / height | 225 mm | 206 mm | +19 mm |
| Head diameter / width | 34 mm | 62 mm | −28 mm |
| Weight | 605 g | 594 g | +11 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is EOS 32LRZ better than R40?
- Submersible to120 m vs 100 m+20%
Why is R40 better than EOS 32LRZ?
- Maximum output930 lm vs 2,300 lm2.5×
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 930 lm | 2,300 lm |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| LED & beam | ||
| LED emitter | — | Cree XP-L |
| LED maker | — | Cree |
| Number of LEDs | 1 | 3 |
| Colour temperature | — | 7,300K |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | — | 26800 Li-ion |
| Maximum runtime | 4.4 h | — |
| Rechargeable | — | Yes |
| Charging time | 7 h | — |
| Build & durability | ||
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx8 |
| Submersible to | 120 m | 100 m |
| Body material | Aluminium | Aluminium |
| Size & weight | ||
| Length / height | 225 mm | 206 mm |
| Head diameter / width | 34 mm | 62 mm |
| Weight | 605 g | 594 g |
| Modes & features | ||
| Colours | Silver | — |
