How we scoreBlogAdvertise
html›body›main#compare791 models · updated Oct 21, 2026
  1. compoundsemi.com
  2. Compare
  3. Shark vs R40

Oceama Shark vs Seac R40

What Shark does better (2) and where R40 wins (0) — every spec side by side.

Oceama Shark
Oceama · 2024Shark
8.4Score
2 advantages≈ $260
vs
Seac R40
Seac · 2022R40
9.0Score
0 advantages≈ $240
Higher score
8.8Brightness & throw8.3
3.1Build & durability2.5

Why is Shark better than R40?

  1. Maximum output2,500 lm vs 2,300 lm+9%
  2. Weight496 g vs 594 g+20%

Why is R40 better than Shark?

R40 has no measurable advantages in this pair.

Specifications

Side by side

Oceama SharkOceama Shark≈ $2608.4
Seac R40Seac R40≈ $2409.0
Light output
Maximum output2,500 lm2,300 lm
Light sourceLEDLED
LED & beam
LED emitterCree XHP50.2Cree XP-L
LED makerCreeCree
Number of LEDs—3
Colour temperature—7,300K
Battery & charging
Battery26650 Li-ion26800 Li-ion
Battery capacity5,000 mAh—
Maximum runtime1.5 h—
RechargeableYesYes
Build & durability
Water protection (IPx)IPx8IPx8
Submersible to100 m100 m
Body materialAluminiumAluminium
Size & weight
Length / height200 mm206 mm
Head diameter / width—62 mm
Weight496 g594 g
Modes & features
SOS / beaconYes—
ColoursBlack—
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare