- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- E52C vs MH10 V2
Nextorch E52C vs Nitecore MH10 V2
What E52C does better (3) and where MH10 V2 wins (1) — every spec side by side.
Why is E52C better than MH10 V2?
- Maximum output3,000 lm vs 1,200 lm2.5×
- Beam distance (ANSI FL1)210 m vs 201 m+4%
- Peak beam intensity11,025 cd vs 10,100 cd+9%
Why is MH10 V2 better than E52C?
- Maximum runtime65 h vs 1,488 h22.9×
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 3,000 lm | 1,200 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | 11,025 cd | 10,100 cd |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 210 m | 201 m |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | 21700 Li-ion | 21700 Li-ion |
| Battery capacity | — | 4,000 mAh |
| Maximum runtime | 65 h | 1,488 h |
| Rechargeable | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C charging | Yes | Yes |
| Also runs on AA/AAA/CR123A | — | Yes |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | IPX8 | IPX8 |
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx8 |
| Body material | Aluminium | Aluminium |
| Pocket clip | Yes | Yes |
| Size & weight | ||
| Length / height | 153 mm | — |
| Head diameter / width | 30 mm | — |
| Weight | 130 g | — |
| Modes & features | ||
| Strobe | — | Yes |
| SOS / beacon | — | Yes |
| Mode memory | — | Yes |
