- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- eStar vs HA29 UHE MCT
Nextorch eStar vs Nitecore HA29 UHE MCT
What eStar does better (4) and where HA29 UHE MCT wins (2) — every spec side by side.
vs
8.3Brightness & throw7.3
5.7Battery & charging7.9
5.5Build & durability7.8
5.7Light quality5.7
5.9Features5.9
Why is eStar better than HA29 UHE MCT?
- Beam distance (ANSI FL1)205 m vs 169 m+21%
- Peak beam intensity10,506 cd vs 7,140 cd+47%
- Maximum output1,300 lm vs 1,200 lm+8%
- Weight87 g vs 112 g+29%
Why is HA29 UHE MCT better than eStar?
- Water protection (IPx)IPx7 vs IPx8+14%
- Maximum runtime115 h vs 122 h+6%
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 1,300 lm | 1,200 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | 10,506 cd | 7,140 cd |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 205 m | 169 m |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| LED & beam | ||
| Colour temperature | — | 3,000K |
| Adjustable colour temperature | — | Yes |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | AAA | AAA |
| Battery capacity | 1,200 mAh | — |
| Maximum runtime | 115 h | 122 h |
| Rechargeable | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C charging | Yes | — |
| Also runs on AA/AAA/CR123A | — | Yes |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | IP67 | IPX8 |
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx7 | IPx8 |
| Impact resistance (drop) | 1 m | — |
| Pocket clip | — | Yes |
| Size & weight | ||
| Length / height | 63 mm | — |
| Head diameter / width | 46 mm | — |
| Body diameter / depth | 36 mm | — |
| Weight | 87 g | 112 g |
| Modes & features | ||
| Stepless (ramping) brightness | Yes | — |
| SOS / beacon | Yes | — |
| Red light | Yes | Yes |
| Lockout | — | Yes |
| Mode memory | Yes | — |
