- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- eStar vs HL900
Nextorch eStar vs Simond HL900
What eStar does better (2) and where HL900 wins (0) — every spec side by side.
Why is eStar better than HL900?
- Maximum runtime115 h vs 30 h3.8×
- Beam distance (ANSI FL1)205 m vs 200 m+2%
Why is HL900 better than eStar?
HL900 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 1,300 lm | — |
| Peak beam intensity | 10,506 cd | — |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 205 m | 200 m |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | AAA | — |
| Battery capacity | 1,200 mAh | — |
| Maximum runtime | 115 h | 30 h |
| Rechargeable | Yes | — |
| USB-C charging | Yes | Yes |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | IP67 | — |
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx7 | IPx7 |
| Submersible to | — | 1 m |
| Impact resistance (drop) | 1 m | — |
| Size & weight | ||
| Length / height | 63 mm | — |
| Head diameter / width | 46 mm | — |
| Body diameter / depth | 36 mm | — |
| Weight | 87 g | — |
| Modes & features | ||
| Stepless (ramping) brightness | Yes | — |
| SOS / beacon | Yes | — |
| Red light | Yes | Yes |
| Mode memory | Yes | — |
| Colours | — | Red, Black |
