- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- HC65 UHE vs HC65M V2.0
Nitecore HC65 UHE vs Nitecore HC65M V2.0
What HC65 UHE does better (4) and where HC65M V2.0 wins (1) — every spec side by side.
vs
8.9Brightness & throw8.3
7.1Battery & charging8.4
7.3Build & durability5.9
5.9Features5.9
Why is HC65 UHE better than HC65M V2.0?
- Beam distance (ANSI FL1)222 m vs 165 m+35%
- Maximum output2,000 lm vs 1,750 lm+14%
- Battery capacity4,000 mAh vs 3,500 mAh+14%
- Water protection (IPx)IPx8 vs IPx7+14%
Why is HC65M V2.0 better than HC65 UHE?
- Maximum runtime82 h vs 110 h+34%
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 2,000 lm | 1,750 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | 12,293 cd | — |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 222 m | 165 m |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| LED & beam | ||
| Number of LEDs | 8 | 3 |
| Colour rendering (CRI) | 90 | — |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | 18650 Li-ion | — |
| Battery capacity | 4,000 mAh | 3,500 mAh |
| Maximum runtime | 82 h | 110 h |
| Rechargeable | Yes | — |
| USB-C charging | Yes | Yes |
| Battery level indicator | Yes | — |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | IP68 | — |
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx7 |
| Submersible to | 2 m | — |
| Impact resistance (drop) | 2 m | — |
| Body material | Aluminium | Aluminium |
| Size & weight | ||
| Weight | 152 g | — |
| Modes & features | ||
| Strobe | Yes | Yes |
| SOS / beacon | Yes | Yes |
| Red light | Yes | — |
| Lockout | Yes | — |
