- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- UT2000 vs UT6 MCT
Nitecore UT2000 vs Nitecore UT6 MCT
What UT2000 does better (5) and where UT6 MCT wins (0) — every spec side by side.
Why is UT2000 better than UT6 MCT?
- Battery capacity12,000 mAh vs 4,000 mAh3×
- Maximum runtime55 h vs 31 h+77%
- Maximum output2,000 lm vs 1,600 lm+25%
- Beam distance (ANSI FL1)220 m vs 195 m+13%
- Peak beam intensity12,126 cd vs 9,510 cd+28%
Why is UT6 MCT better than UT2000?
UT6 MCT has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 2,000 lm | 1,600 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | 12,126 cd | 9,510 cd |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 220 m | 195 m |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| LED & beam | ||
| Colour rendering (CRI) | 97 | — |
| Colour temperature | 3,000K | — |
| Adjustable colour temperature | Yes | — |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery capacity | 12,000 mAh | 4,000 mAh |
| Maximum runtime | 55 h | 31 h |
| Rechargeable | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C charging | Yes | — |
| Power bank function | Yes | — |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | IP68 | IP68 |
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx8 |
| Impact resistance (drop) | 2 m | 2 m |
| Body material | Aluminium | Magnesium |
| Size & weight | ||
| Weight | 122 g | — |
| Modes & features | ||
| Red light | Yes | — |
