- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- UT2000 vs ZB9H
Nitecore UT2000 vs Zweibrüder ZB9H
What UT2000 does better (3) and where ZB9H wins (1) — every spec side by side.
Why is UT2000 better than ZB9H?
- Battery capacity12,000 mAh vs 5,000 mAh2.4×
- Weight122 g vs 252 g2.1×
- Maximum runtime55 h vs 50 h+10%
Why is ZB9H better than UT2000?
- Beam distance (ANSI FL1)220 m vs 260 m+18%
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 2,000 lm | 2,000 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | 12,126 cd | — |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 220 m | 260 m |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| Adjustable focus (zoom) | — | Yes |
| LED & beam | ||
| Colour rendering (CRI) | 97 | — |
| Colour temperature | 3,000K | — |
| Adjustable colour temperature | Yes | — |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | — | Built-in Li-ion / Li-Po |
| Battery capacity | 12,000 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Maximum runtime | 55 h | 50 h |
| Rechargeable | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C charging | Yes | Yes |
| Charging time | — | 3.5 h |
| Power bank function | Yes | — |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | IP68 | — |
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx8 | — |
| Impact resistance (drop) | 2 m | — |
| Body material | Aluminium | Aluminium |
| Size & weight | ||
| Weight | 122 g | 252 g |
| Modes & features | ||
| Red light | Yes | Yes |
| Colours | — | Black |
