- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- Taschenlampe 3315 138 vs Aurora A26
Peli Taschenlampe 3315 138 vs RovyVon Aurora A26
What Taschenlampe 3315 138 does better (0) and where Aurora A26 wins (2) — every spec side by side.
vs
2.7Brightness & throw3.6
Why is Taschenlampe 3315 138 better than Aurora A26?
Taschenlampe 3315 138 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Why is Aurora A26 better than Taschenlampe 3315 138?
- Maximum output138 lm vs 600 lm4.3×
- Beam distance (ANSI FL1)146 m vs 180 m+23%
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 138 lm | 600 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | — | 8,100 cd |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 146 m | 180 m |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| LED & beam | ||
| Colour temperature | — | 4,000K |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | AA | — |
| Number of batteries | 3 | — |
| Rechargeable | — | Yes |
| USB-C charging | — | Yes |
| Build & durability | ||
| Body material | Plastic / polymer | — |
| Pocket clip | — | Yes |
| Modes & features | ||
| Red light | — | Yes |
| UV light | — | Yes |
| Colours | Yellow | — |
