- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- Nao LT vs Swift RL
Petzl Nao LT vs Petzl Swift RL
What Nao LT does better (3) and where Swift RL wins (5) — every spec side by side.
Why is Nao LT better than Swift RL?
- Water protection (IPx)IPx8 vs IPx42×
- Weight90 g vs 110 g+22%
- Charging time3.5 h vs 5 h+43%
Why is Swift RL better than Nao LT?
- Beam distance (ANSI FL1)75 m vs 155 m2.1×
- Maximum output600 lm vs 1,100 lm+83%
- Peak beam intensity1,410 cd vs 6,010 cd4.3×
- Battery capacity1,250 mAh vs 2,350 mAh+88%
- Maximum runtime85 h vs 100 h+18%
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 600 lm | 1,100 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | 1,410 cd | 6,010 cd |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 75 m | 155 m |
| Runtime at maximum output | 120 min | — |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | AAA | Built-in Li-ion / Li-Po |
| Number of batteries | 3 | — |
| Battery capacity | 1,250 mAh | 2,350 mAh |
| Maximum runtime | 85 h | 100 h |
| Rechargeable | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C charging | Yes | Yes |
| Charging time | 3.5 h | 5 h |
| Battery level indicator | — | Yes |
| Build & durability | ||
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx4 |
| Submersible to | 2 m | — |
| Size & weight | ||
| Weight | 90 g | 110 g |
| Modes & features | ||
| Strobe | Yes | Yes |
| Red light | — | Yes |
| Motion / reactive sensor | Yes | Yes |
