- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- Nao LT vs Ex-View
Petzl Nao LT vs Scangrip Ex-View
What Nao LT does better (2) and where Ex-View wins (1) — every spec side by side.
Why is Nao LT better than Ex-View?
- Maximum output600 lm vs 300 lm2×
- Maximum runtime85 h vs 2.5 h34×
Why is Ex-View better than Nao LT?
- Battery capacity1,250 mAh vs 1,600 mAh+28%
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 600 lm | 300 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | 1,410 cd | — |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 75 m | — |
| Runtime at maximum output | 120 min | — |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | AAA | Built-in Li-ion / Li-Po |
| Number of batteries | 3 | — |
| Battery capacity | 1,250 mAh | 1,600 mAh |
| Maximum runtime | 85 h | 2.5 h |
| Rechargeable | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C charging | Yes | — |
| Charging time | 3.5 h | 3.5 h |
| Build & durability | ||
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx8 |
| Submersible to | 2 m | 2 m |
| Size & weight | ||
| Weight | 90 g | — |
| Modes & features | ||
| Strobe | Yes | — |
| Motion / reactive sensor | Yes | — |
