- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- Nao LT vs HL900
Petzl Nao LT vs Simond HL900
What Nao LT does better (3) and where HL900 wins (1) — every spec side by side.
Why is Nao LT better than HL900?
- Maximum runtime85 h vs 30 h2.8×
- Submersible to2 m vs 1 m2×
- Water protection (IPx)IPx8 vs IPx7+14%
Why is HL900 better than Nao LT?
- Beam distance (ANSI FL1)75 m vs 200 m2.7×
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 600 lm | — |
| Peak beam intensity | 1,410 cd | — |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 75 m | 200 m |
| Runtime at maximum output | 120 min | — |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | AAA | — |
| Number of batteries | 3 | — |
| Battery capacity | 1,250 mAh | — |
| Maximum runtime | 85 h | 30 h |
| Rechargeable | Yes | — |
| USB-C charging | Yes | Yes |
| Charging time | 3.5 h | — |
| Build & durability | ||
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx7 |
| Submersible to | 2 m | 1 m |
| Size & weight | ||
| Weight | 90 g | — |
| Modes & features | ||
| Strobe | Yes | — |
| Red light | — | Yes |
| Motion / reactive sensor | Yes | — |
| Colours | — | Red, Black |
