- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- Nao LT vs Sports H10 Pro
Petzl Nao LT vs VARTA Sports H10 Pro
What Nao LT does better (3) and where Sports H10 Pro wins (0) — every spec side by side.
vs
4.3Brightness & throw2.3
4.6Battery & charging3.2
8.2Build & durability6.7
Why is Nao LT better than Sports H10 Pro?
- Maximum output600 lm vs 100 lm6×
- Maximum runtime85 h vs 35 h2.4×
- Water protection (IPx)IPx8 vs IPx7+14%
Why is Sports H10 Pro better than Nao LT?
Sports H10 Pro has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 600 lm | 100 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | 1,410 cd | — |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 75 m | — |
| Runtime at maximum output | 120 min | — |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | AAA | Built-in Li-ion / Li-Po |
| Number of batteries | 3 | — |
| Battery capacity | 1,250 mAh | — |
| Maximum runtime | 85 h | 35 h |
| Rechargeable | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C charging | Yes | — |
| Charging time | 3.5 h | — |
| Build & durability | ||
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx7 |
| Submersible to | 2 m | — |
| Body material | — | Plastic / polymer |
| Size & weight | ||
| Weight | 90 g | 91 g |
| Modes & features | ||
| Strobe | Yes | — |
| Motion / reactive sensor | Yes | — |
