How we scoreBlogAdvertise
html›body›main#compare791 models · updated Oct 21, 2026
  1. compoundsemi.com
  2. Compare
  3. Nao RL vs Explore 5

Petzl Nao RL vs Silva Explore 5

What Nao RL does better (3) and where Explore 5 wins (2) — every spec side by side.

Petzl Nao RL
Petzl · 2022Nao RL
8.0Score
3 advantages≈ $120
Higher score
vs
Silva Explore 5
Silva · 2024Explore 5
6.7Score
2 advantages≈ $60
8.5Brightness & throw5.8
6.2Battery & charging7.1
5.9Features5.9

Why is Nao RL better than Explore 5?

  1. Maximum output1,500 lm vs 700 lm2.1×
  2. Beam distance (ANSI FL1)200 m vs 115 m+74%
  3. Battery capacity3,200 mAh vs 2,000 mAh+60%

Why is Explore 5 better than Nao RL?

  1. Weight145 g vs 116 g+25%
  2. Charging time3.5 h vs 2 h+75%
Specifications

Side by side

Petzl Nao RLPetzl Nao RL≈ $1208.0
Silva Explore 5Silva Explore 5≈ $606.7
Light output
Maximum output1,500 lm700 lm
Peak beam intensity10,000 cd—
Beam distance (ANSI FL1)200 m115 m
Runtime at maximum output1,440 min—
Light sourceLEDLED
Adjustable focus (zoom)Yes—
Battery & charging
BatteryBuilt-in Li-ion / Li-PoBuilt-in Li-ion / Li-Po
Battery capacity3,200 mAh2,000 mAh
Maximum runtime80 h—
RechargeableYesYes
Charging time3.5 h2 h
Build & durability
Water protection (IPx)—IPx7
Size & weight
Weight145 g116 g
Modes & features
StrobeYes—
Red lightYesYes
Motion / reactive sensorYes—
ColoursBlack—
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare