How we scoreBlogAdvertise
html›body›main#compare791 models · updated Oct 21, 2026
  1. compoundsemi.com
  2. Compare
  3. Nao RL vs Seek 320

Petzl Nao RL vs Silva Seek 320

What Nao RL does better (1) and where Seek 320 wins (0) — every spec side by side.

Petzl Nao RL
Petzl · 2022Nao RL
8.0Score
1 advantage≈ $120
Higher score
vs
Silva Seek 320
Silva · 2025Seek 320
4.9Score
0 advantages≈ $19
8.5Brightness & throw3.3
5.9Features5.9

Why is Nao RL better than Seek 320?

  1. Maximum output1,500 lm vs 320 lm4.7×

Why is Seek 320 better than Nao RL?

Seek 320 has no measurable advantages in this pair.

Specifications

Side by side

Petzl Nao RLPetzl Nao RL≈ $1208.0
Silva Seek 320Silva Seek 320≈ $194.9
Light output
Maximum output1,500 lm320 lm
Peak beam intensity10,000 cd—
Beam distance (ANSI FL1)200 m—
Runtime at maximum output1,440 min—
Light sourceLEDLED
Adjustable focus (zoom)Yes—
Battery & charging
BatteryBuilt-in Li-ion / Li-PoAAA
Battery capacity3,200 mAh—
Maximum runtime80 h—
RechargeableYes—
Charging time3.5 h—
Build & durability
Water protection (IPx)—IPx7
Body material—Plastic / polymer
Size & weight
Weight145 g—
Modes & features
StrobeYes—
Red lightYesYes
Motion / reactive sensorYes—
ColoursBlack—
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare