- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- Nao RL vs Workflex Motion Sensor H20
Petzl Nao RL vs VARTA Workflex Motion Sensor H20
What Nao RL does better (1) and where Workflex Motion Sensor H20 wins (0) — every spec side by side.
vs
8.7Brightness & throw3.4
5.9Features5.9
Why is Nao RL better than Workflex Motion Sensor H20?
- Beam distance (ANSI FL1)200 m vs 78 m2.6×
Why is Workflex Motion Sensor H20 better than Nao RL?
Workflex Motion Sensor H20 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 1,500 lm | — |
| Peak beam intensity | 10,000 cd | — |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 200 m | 78 m |
| Runtime at maximum output | 1,440 min | — |
| Light source | LED | COB LED panel |
| Adjustable focus (zoom) | Yes | — |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | Built-in Li-ion / Li-Po | AAA |
| Battery capacity | 3,200 mAh | — |
| Maximum runtime | 80 h | — |
| Rechargeable | Yes | — |
| Charging time | 3.5 h | — |
| Build & durability | ||
| Water protection (IPx) | — | IPx4 |
| Size & weight | ||
| Weight | 145 g | — |
| Modes & features | ||
| Strobe | Yes | Yes |
| SOS / beacon | — | Yes |
| Red light | Yes | — |
| Motion / reactive sensor | Yes | Yes |
| Colours | Black | Black |
