- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- Xena vs I-Match 3
Petzl Xena vs Scangrip I-Match 3
What Xena does better (3) and where I-Match 3 wins (4) — every spec side by side.
Why is Xena better than I-Match 3?
- Maximum output1,400 lm vs 250 lm5.6×
- Maximum runtime75 h vs 15 h5×
- Battery capacity3,200 mAh vs 1,600 mAh2×
Why is I-Match 3 better than Xena?
- Weight185 g vs 100 g+85%
- Water protection (IPx)IPx7 vs IPx8+14%
- Submersible to1 m vs 1.5 m+50%
- Charging time4 h vs 3.5 h+14%
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 1,400 lm | 250 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | 7,220 cd | — |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 170 m | — |
| Light source | LED | COB LED panel |
| Adjustable focus (zoom) | Yes | — |
| LED & beam | ||
| Number of LEDs | — | 1 |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Number of batteries | 4 | 1 |
| Battery capacity | 3,200 mAh | 1,600 mAh |
| Maximum runtime | 75 h | 15 h |
| Rechargeable | Yes | — |
| Charging time | 4 h | 3.5 h |
| Build & durability | ||
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx7 | IPx8 |
| Submersible to | 1 m | 1.5 m |
| Size & weight | ||
| Head diameter / width | 100 mm | — |
| Weight | 185 g | 100 g |
| Modes & features | ||
| Strobe | Yes | — |
| Red light | Yes | — |
