- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- E75 vs XP11R
Acebeam E75 vs Coast XP11R
What E75 does better (4) and where XP11R wins (1) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
E75XP11R
| E75 | XP11R | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length / height | 129.3 mm | 150 mm | −20.7 mm |
| Head diameter / width | 35 mm | 38 mm | −3 mm |
| Weight | 217 g | 389 g | −172 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is E75 better than XP11R?
- Maximum output4,500 lm vs 2,100 lm2.1×
- Beam distance (ANSI FL1)260 m vs 155 m+68%
- Weight217 g vs 389 g+79%
- RechargeableYes · XP11R: No
Why is XP11R better than E75?
- Maximum runtime16 h vs 37 h2.3×
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 4,500 lm | 2,100 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | 16,900 cd | — |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 260 m | 155 m |
| Runtime at maximum output | 1 min | — |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| LED & beam | ||
| LED emitter | Nichia 519A | — |
| LED maker | Nichia | — |
| Number of LEDs | 51 | — |
| Colour rendering (CRI) | 90 | — |
| Colour temperature | 3,000K | — |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | 21700 Li-ion | AAA |
| Number of batteries | — | 3 |
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | — |
| Maximum runtime | 16 h | 37 h |
| Rechargeable | Yes | No |
| USB-C charging | Yes | — |
| Battery level indicator | Yes | — |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | IP68 | — |
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx8 | — |
| Submersible to | 2 m | — |
| Impact resistance (drop) | 1.5 m | — |
| Body material | Aluminium | Aluminium |
| Magnetic tail / base | Yes | — |
| Size & weight | ||
| Length / height | 129.3 mm | 150 mm |
| Head diameter / width | 35 mm | 38 mm |
| Body diameter / depth | 28 mm | — |
| Weight | 217 g | 389 g |
| Modes & features | ||
| Brightness levels | 6 | — |
| Switch | Side switch | — |
| Strobe | Yes | — |
| Green / blue / RGB light | Yes | — |
| Colours | Grey, Blue, Silver, Black, Green | Black |
