- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- H50 2.0 vs NU53
Acebeam H50 2.0 vs Nitecore NU53
What H50 2.0 does better (2) and where NU53 wins (3) — every spec side by side.
Why is H50 2.0 better than NU53?
- Weight94 g vs 151 g+61%
- Maximum output2,000 lm vs 1,800 lm+11%
Why is NU53 better than H50 2.0?
- Maximum runtime40 h vs 153 h3.8×
- Beam distance (ANSI FL1)141 m vs 175 m+24%
- Peak beam intensity4,968 cd vs 7,660 cd+54%
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 2,000 lm | 1,800 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | 4,968 cd | 7,660 cd |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 141 m | 175 m |
| Runtime at maximum output | 240 min | — |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| LED & beam | ||
| LED emitter | Luminus SST-20 | — |
| LED maker | Luminus | — |
| Number of LEDs | 3 | 19 |
| Colour temperature | 5,000K | — |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery capacity | — | 6,000 mAh |
| Maximum runtime | 40 h | 153 h |
| Rechargeable | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C charging | — | Yes |
| Battery level indicator | — | Yes |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | IP68 | IP68 |
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx8 |
| Size & weight | ||
| Length / height | 85 mm | — |
| Weight | 94 g | 151 g |
| Modes & features | ||
| Brightness levels | 5 | — |
| SOS / beacon | Yes | Yes |
| Red light | — | Yes |
| Motion / reactive sensor | — | Yes |
| Lockout | — | Yes |
