- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- L35 2.0 vs DN35
Acebeam L35 2.0 vs Imalent DN35
What L35 2.0 does better (3) and where DN35 wins (0) — every spec side by side.
Why is L35 2.0 better than DN35?
- Maximum output5,000 lm vs 2,200 lm2.3×
- Beam distance (ANSI FL1)650 m vs 596 m+9%
- Peak beam intensity105,620 cd vs 88,800 cd+19%
Why is DN35 better than L35 2.0?
DN35 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 5,000 lm | 2,200 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | 105,620 cd | 88,800 cd |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 650 m | 596 m |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| LED & beam | ||
| LED emitter | Cree XHP70.3 HI | Cree XHP35 HI |
| LED maker | Cree | Cree |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | 21700 Li-ion | 26650 Li-ion |
| Battery capacity | — | 4,500 mAh |
| Maximum runtime | 288 h | — |
| Rechargeable | — | Yes |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | IP68 | — |
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx8 | — |
| Submersible to | — | 2 m |
| Impact resistance (drop) | — | 1.5 m |
| Body material | — | Aluminium |
| Size & weight | ||
| Weight | — | 115 g |
| Modes & features | ||
| Switch | Tail switch | — |
| Tactical tail switch (momentary on) | — | Yes |
| Strobe | Yes | — |
