How we scoreBlogAdvertise
html›body›main#compare791 models · updated Oct 21, 2026
  1. compoundsemi.com
  2. Compare
  3. PD35 V2.0 Digital vs DN35

Fenix PD35 V2.0 Digital vs Imalent DN35

What PD35 V2.0 Digital does better (1) and where DN35 wins (3) — every spec side by side.

Fenix PD35 V2.0 Digital
Fenix · 2018PD35 V2.0 Digital
8.7Score
1 advantage≈ $75
vs
Imalent DN35
Imalent · 2018DN35
9.2Score
3 advantages≈ $105
Higher score
4.2Brightness & throw7.9
8.8Build & durability6.9

Why is PD35 V2.0 Digital better than DN35?

  1. Weight88 g vs 115 g+31%

Why is DN35 better than PD35 V2.0 Digital?

  1. Beam distance (ANSI FL1)250 m vs 596 m2.4×
  2. Maximum output1,000 lm vs 2,200 lm2.2×
  3. Peak beam intensity15,620 cd vs 88,800 cd5.7×
Specifications

Side by side

Imalent DN35Imalent DN35≈ $1059.2
Light output
Maximum output1,000 lm2,200 lm
Peak beam intensity15,620 cd88,800 cd
Beam distance (ANSI FL1)250 m596 m
Light sourceLEDLED
LED & beam
LED emitterCree XP-L HICree XHP35 HI
LED makerCreeCree
Battery & charging
Battery—26650 Li-ion
Battery capacity—4,500 mAh
Maximum runtime430 h—
Rechargeable—Yes
Battery level indicatorYes—
Build & durability
Protection ratingIP68—
Water protection (IPx)IPx8—
Submersible to—2 m
Impact resistance (drop)—1.5 m
Body material—Aluminium
Size & weight
Length / height138 mm—
Head diameter / width25.4 mm—
Body diameter / depth23 mm—
Weight88 g115 g
Modes & features
Brightness levels5—
SwitchDual switches—
Tactical tail switch (momentary on)—Yes
StrobeYes—
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare