- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- W50 2.0 vs LR50R V2.0
Acebeam W50 2.0 vs Fenix LR50R V2.0
What W50 2.0 does better (0) and where LR50R V2.0 wins (1) — every spec side by side.
vs
6.3Brightness & throw9.2
7.8Build & durability4.2
5.5Light quality5.5
5.9Features5.9
Dimensions
Size comparison
W50 2.0LR50R V2.0
| W50 2.0 | LR50R V2.0 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length / height | 216.4 mm | 217.6 mm | −1.2 mm |
| Head diameter / width | 84 mm | 89.6 mm | −5.6 mm |
| Body diameter / depth | 79 mm | 53.9 mm | +25.1 mm |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is W50 2.0 better than LR50R V2.0?
W50 2.0 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Why is LR50R V2.0 better than W50 2.0?
- Maximum output2,200 lm vs 18,000 lm8.2×
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 2,200 lm | 18,000 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | — | 178,930 cd |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | — | 846 m |
| Light source | LEP (laser-excited phosphor) | LED |
| Adjustable focus (zoom) | Yes | — |
| LED & beam | ||
| LED emitter | — | Luminus SST-70 |
| LED maker | — | Luminus |
| Number of LEDs | — | 6 |
| Colour temperature | — | 6,500K |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | 18650 Li-ion | 46950 Li-ion |
| Battery capacity | — | 32,000 mAh |
| Maximum runtime | — | 195 h |
| Rechargeable | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C charging | Yes | Yes |
| Battery level indicator | — | Yes |
| Power bank function | — | Yes |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | IP68 | IP68 |
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx8 |
| Size & weight | ||
| Length / height | 216.4 mm | 217.6 mm |
| Head diameter / width | 84 mm | 89.6 mm |
| Body diameter / depth | 79 mm | 53.9 mm |
| Weight | — | 1,150 g |
| Modes & features | ||
| Stepless (ramping) brightness | — | Yes |
| Switch | — | Rotary / scroll wheel |
| Strobe | Yes | Yes |
| SOS / beacon | — | Yes |
| Red light | — | Yes |
| UV light | — | Yes |
| Lockout | — | Yes |
| Mode memory | — | Yes |
