- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- W50 2.0 vs P40
Acebeam W50 2.0 vs Nitecore P40
What W50 2.0 does better (1) and where P40 wins (0) — every spec side by side.
Why is W50 2.0 better than P40?
- Maximum output2,200 lm vs 2,000 lm+10%
Why is P40 better than W50 2.0?
P40 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 2,200 lm | 2,000 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | — | 2,102,500 cd |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | — | 2,900 m |
| Light source | LEP (laser-excited phosphor) | LED + LEP |
| Adjustable focus (zoom) | Yes | — |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | 18650 Li-ion | — |
| Battery capacity | — | 5,500 mAh |
| Maximum runtime | — | 20 h |
| Rechargeable | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C charging | Yes | Yes |
| Battery level indicator | — | Yes |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | IP68 | IP68 |
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx8 |
| Impact resistance (drop) | — | 1 m |
| Size & weight | ||
| Length / height | 216.4 mm | — |
| Head diameter / width | 84 mm | — |
| Body diameter / depth | 79 mm | — |
| Weight | — | 390 g |
| Modes & features | ||
| Strobe | Yes | — |
