- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- 779.CBTPB vs Li-MH
Facom 779.CBTPB vs Gedore Li-MH
What 779.CBTPB does better (2) and where Li-MH wins (2) — every spec side by side.
Why is 779.CBTPB better than Li-MH?
- Maximum runtime51 h vs 3 h17×
- Weight176 g vs 295 g+68%
Why is Li-MH better than 779.CBTPB?
- Maximum output309 lm vs 620 lm2×
- RechargeableNo · 779.CBTPB: Yes
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 309 lm | 620 lm |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 233 m | — |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | AAA | Built-in Li-ion / Li-Po |
| Maximum runtime | 51 h | 3 h |
| Rechargeable | No | Yes |
| Build & durability | ||
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx4 | — |
| Magnetic tail / base | — | Yes |
| Size & weight | ||
| Length / height | — | 477 mm |
| Weight | 176 g | 295 g |
| Modes & features | ||
| UV light | — | Yes |
| Colours | Black | — |
