- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- E03R vs E12 V2.0
Fenix E03R vs Fenix E12 V2.0
What E03R does better (3) and where E12 V2.0 wins (4) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
E03RE12 V2.0
| E03R | E12 V2.0 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length / height | 47 mm | 76.6 mm | −29.6 mm |
| Head diameter / width | 24 mm | 19 mm | +5 mm |
| Body diameter / depth | 12 mm | 17.6 mm | −5.6 mm |
| Weight | 22 g | 27 g | −5 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is E03R better than E12 V2.0?
- Maximum output260 lm vs 160 lm+62%
- Weight22 g vs 27 g+23%
- Brightness levels4 vs 3+33%
Why is E12 V2.0 better than E03R?
- Peak beam intensity440 cd vs 1,160 cd2.6×
- Maximum runtime18 h vs 70 h3.9×
- Beam distance (ANSI FL1)42 m vs 68 m+62%
- Water protection (IPx)IPx6 vs IPx8+33%
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 260 lm | 160 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | 440 cd | 1,160 cd |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 42 m | 68 m |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | — | AA |
| Battery capacity | 200 mAh | — |
| Maximum runtime | 18 h | 70 h |
| Rechargeable | Yes | — |
| USB-C charging | Yes | — |
| Battery level indicator | Yes | — |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | IP66 | IP68 |
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx6 | IPx8 |
| Pocket clip | — | Yes |
| Size & weight | ||
| Length / height | 47 mm | 76.6 mm |
| Head diameter / width | 24 mm | 19 mm |
| Body diameter / depth | 12 mm | 17.6 mm |
| Weight | 22 g | 27 g |
| Modes & features | ||
| Brightness levels | 4 | 3 |
| Switch | — | Tail switch |
| Red light | Yes | — |
