- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- E03R vs K3 V2.0
Fenix E03R vs Nextorch K3 V2.0
What E03R does better (2) and where K3 V2.0 wins (4) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
E03RK3 V2.0
| E03R | K3 V2.0 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length / height | 47 mm | 150 mm | −103 mm |
| Head diameter / width | 24 mm | 14 mm | +10 mm |
| Body diameter / depth | 12 mm | 12 mm | = |
| Weight | 22 g | 28 g | −6 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is E03R better than K3 V2.0?
- Maximum output260 lm vs 250 lm+4%
- Weight22 g vs 28 g+27%
Why is K3 V2.0 better than E03R?
- Peak beam intensity440 cd vs 900 cd2×
- Beam distance (ANSI FL1)42 m vs 60 m+43%
- Water protection (IPx)IPx6 vs IPx7+17%
- Maximum runtime18 h vs 20 h+11%
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 260 lm | 250 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | 440 cd | 900 cd |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 42 m | 60 m |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| LED & beam | ||
| LED emitter | — | Cree XP-G |
| LED maker | — | Cree |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | — | AAA |
| Battery capacity | 200 mAh | — |
| Maximum runtime | 18 h | 20 h |
| Rechargeable | Yes | — |
| USB-C charging | Yes | — |
| Battery level indicator | Yes | — |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | IP66 | IPX7 |
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx6 | IPx7 |
| Impact resistance (drop) | — | 1 m |
| Body material | — | Aluminium |
| Size & weight | ||
| Length / height | 47 mm | 150 mm |
| Head diameter / width | 24 mm | 14 mm |
| Body diameter / depth | 12 mm | 12 mm |
| Weight | 22 g | 28 g |
| Modes & features | ||
| Brightness levels | 4 | 4 |
| Strobe | — | Yes |
| Red light | Yes | — |
| Mode memory | — | Yes |
