- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- HT18R V2.0 vs TK35R
Fenix HT18R V2.0 vs Fenix TK35R
What HT18R V2.0 does better (3) and where TK35R wins (3) — every spec side by side.
vs
8.9Brightness & throw8.8
8.4Battery & charging7.0
4.3Build & durability4.9
5.9Features5.9
Why is HT18R V2.0 better than TK35R?
- Beam distance (ANSI FL1)1,100 m vs 610 m+80%
- Peak beam intensity302,500 cd vs 93,020 cd3.3×
- Battery capacity6,000 mAh vs 4,000 mAh+50%
Why is TK35R better than HT18R V2.0?
- Maximum output3,700 lm vs 5,800 lm+57%
- Maximum runtime87 h vs 105 h+21%
- Weight358 g vs 342 g+5%
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 3,700 lm | 5,800 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | 302,500 cd | 93,020 cd |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 1,100 m | 610 m |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| LED & beam | ||
| LED emitter | Luminus SFT-90 | Luminus SFT-25R |
| LED maker | Luminus | Luminus |
| Number of LEDs | — | 4 |
| Colour temperature | 6,500K | 7,500K |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | 21700 Li-ion | 18650 Li-ion |
| Battery capacity | 6,000 mAh | 4,000 mAh |
| Maximum runtime | 87 h | 105 h |
| Rechargeable | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C charging | Yes | Yes |
| Battery level indicator | Yes | Yes |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | IP68 | IP68 |
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx8 |
| Submersible to | 1.5 m | — |
| Body material | Aluminium | Aluminium |
| Size & weight | ||
| Length / height | — | 154 mm |
| Head diameter / width | — | 43 mm |
| Weight | 358 g | 342 g |
| Modes & features | ||
| Switch | Side switch | Dual switches |
| Strobe | Yes | Yes |
| SOS / beacon | Yes | — |
| Red light | — | Yes |
| UV light | — | Yes |
| Lockout | Yes | — |
| Mode memory | Yes | Yes |
| Colours | Black | Black |
