- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- PD35 V2.0 Digital vs T102
Fenix PD35 V2.0 Digital vs Wuben T102
What PD35 V2.0 Digital does better (0) and where T102 wins (1) — every spec side by side.
vs
4.2Brightness & throw8.1
9.7Battery & charging6.1
8.8Build & durability7.8
Why is PD35 V2.0 Digital better than T102?
PD35 V2.0 Digital has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Why is T102 better than PD35 V2.0 Digital?
- Maximum output1,000 lm vs 3,500 lm3.5×
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 1,000 lm | 3,500 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | 15,620 cd | — |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 250 m | — |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| LED & beam | ||
| LED emitter | Cree XP-L HI | Cree XHP70.2 |
| LED maker | Cree | Cree |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Maximum runtime | 430 h | — |
| Rechargeable | — | Yes |
| USB-C charging | — | Yes |
| Battery level indicator | Yes | Yes |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | IP68 | IP68 |
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx8 |
| Body material | — | Aluminium |
| Size & weight | ||
| Length / height | 138 mm | — |
| Head diameter / width | 25.4 mm | — |
| Body diameter / depth | 23 mm | — |
| Weight | 88 g | — |
| Modes & features | ||
| Brightness levels | 5 | — |
| Switch | Dual switches | — |
| Strobe | Yes | — |
