How we scoreBlogAdvertise
html›body›main#compare791 models · updated Oct 21, 2026
  1. compoundsemi.com
  2. Compare
  3. PD35 V2.0 vs DM35

Fenix PD35 V2.0 vs Imalent DM35

What PD35 V2.0 does better (1) and where DM35 wins (3) — every spec side by side.

Fenix PD35 V2.0
Fenix · 2018PD35 V2.0
8.7Score
1 advantage≈ $70
Higher score
vs
Imalent DM35
Imalent · 2019DM35
8.6Score
3 advantages≈ $95
4.2Brightness & throw6.9
9.7Battery & charging6.9
8.8Build & durability8.5
5.9Features5.9

Why is PD35 V2.0 better than DM35?

  1. Maximum runtime430 h vs 192 h2.2×

Why is DM35 better than PD35 V2.0?

  1. Maximum output1,000 lm vs 2,000 lm2×
  2. Peak beam intensity15,620 cd vs 50,960 cd3.3×
  3. Beam distance (ANSI FL1)250 m vs 450 m+80%
Specifications

Side by side

Fenix PD35 V2.0Fenix PD35 V2.0≈ $708.7
Imalent DM35Imalent DM35≈ $958.6
Light output
Maximum output1,000 lm2,000 lm
Peak beam intensity15,620 cd50,960 cd
Beam distance (ANSI FL1)250 m450 m
Light sourceLEDLED
LED & beam
LED emitterCree XP-L HICree XHP
LED makerCreeCree
Battery & charging
Battery—21700 Li-ion, AAA
Battery capacity—5,000 mAh
Maximum runtime430 h192 h
Rechargeable—Yes
USB-C charging—No
Battery level indicatorYes—
Build & durability
Protection ratingIP68—
Water protection (IPx)IPx8—
Submersible to—2 m
Impact resistance (drop)—1.5 m
Body material—Aluminium
Magnetic tail / base—Yes
Pocket clip—Yes
Can tail-stand—Yes
Size & weight
Length / height138 mm—
Head diameter / width25.4 mm—
Body diameter / depth23 mm—
Weight88 g87 g
Modes & features
Brightness levels5—
SwitchDual switches—
StrobeYes—
Red light—Yes
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare