- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- PD35 V2.0 vs i9 CRI
Fenix PD35 V2.0 vs Ledlenser i9 CRI
What PD35 V2.0 does better (5) and where i9 CRI wins (0) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
PD35 V2.0i9 CRI
| PD35 V2.0 | i9 CRI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length / height | 138 mm | 187 mm | −49 mm |
| Head diameter / width | 25.4 mm | 39 mm | −13.6 mm |
| Weight | 88 g | 312 g | −224 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is PD35 V2.0 better than i9 CRI?
- Maximum output1,000 lm vs 300 lm3.3×
- Maximum runtime430 h vs 25 h17.2×
- Weight88 g vs 312 g3.5×
- Water protection (IPx)IPx8 vs IPx42×
- Beam distance (ANSI FL1)250 m vs 240 m+4%
Why is i9 CRI better than PD35 V2.0?
i9 CRI has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 1,000 lm | 300 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | 15,620 cd | — |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 250 m | 240 m |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| LED & beam | ||
| LED emitter | Cree XP-L HI | — |
| LED maker | Cree | — |
| Number of LEDs | — | 1 |
| Colour temperature | — | 4,000K |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | — | C |
| Number of batteries | — | 2 |
| Maximum runtime | 430 h | 25 h |
| Rechargeable | — | No |
| Battery level indicator | Yes | — |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | IP68 | — |
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx4 |
| Body material | — | Aluminium |
| Size & weight | ||
| Length / height | 138 mm | 187 mm |
| Head diameter / width | 25.4 mm | 39 mm |
| Body diameter / depth | 23 mm | — |
| Weight | 88 g | 312 g |
| Modes & features | ||
| Brightness levels | 5 | — |
| Switch | Dual switches | — |
| Strobe | Yes | — |
| Colours | — | Black |
