- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- TK22 V2.0 vs TK35
Fenix TK22 V2.0 vs Fenix TK35
What TK22 V2.0 does better (2) and where TK35 wins (4) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
TK22 V2.0TK35
| TK22 V2.0 | TK35 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length / height | 150 mm | 159.5 mm | −9.5 mm |
| Head diameter / width | 40 mm | 48 mm | −8 mm |
| Body diameter / depth | 25.4 mm | 43 mm | −17.6 mm |
| Weight | 150 g | 272 g | −122 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is TK22 V2.0 better than TK35?
- Weight150 g vs 272 g+81%
- Maximum output1,600 lm vs 1,300 lm+23%
Why is TK35 better than TK22 V2.0?
- Maximum runtime80 h vs 235 h2.9×
- Beam distance (ANSI FL1)405 m vs 480 m+19%
- Peak beam intensity41,010 cd vs 57,600 cd+40%
- Brightness levels4 vs 5+25%
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 1,600 lm | 1,300 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | 41,010 cd | 57,600 cd |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 405 m | 480 m |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| LED & beam | ||
| LED emitter | Luminus SST-40 | Cree XHP35 HI |
| LED maker | Luminus | Cree |
| Colour temperature | 6,500K | — |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | 21700 Li-ion, 18650 Li-ion | 18650 Li-ion, AAA |
| Maximum runtime | 80 h | 235 h |
| Rechargeable | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C charging | — | No |
| Build & durability | ||
| Pocket clip | Yes | — |
| Size & weight | ||
| Length / height | 150 mm | 159.5 mm |
| Head diameter / width | 40 mm | 48 mm |
| Body diameter / depth | 25.4 mm | 43 mm |
| Weight | 150 g | 272 g |
| Modes & features | ||
| Brightness levels | 4 | 5 |
| Switch | Dual switches | Dual switches |
| Tactical tail switch (momentary on) | Yes | — |
| Strobe | Yes | Yes |
| SOS / beacon | — | Yes |
