- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- TK35 vs TK35UE Fenix
Fenix TK35 vs Fenix TK35UE Fenix
What TK35 does better (4) and where TK35UE Fenix wins (2) — every spec side by side.
vs
6.4Brightness & throw6.2
6.5Battery & charging9.0
3.3Build & durability3.0
7.9Light quality9.0
5.9Features5.9
Dimensions
Size comparison
TK35TK35UE Fenix
| TK35 | TK35UE Fenix | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length / height | 159.5 mm | 164.5 mm | −5 mm |
| Head diameter / width | 48 mm | 48 mm | = |
| Body diameter / depth | 43 mm | 43 mm | = |
| Weight | 272 g | 286 g | −14 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is TK35 better than TK35UE Fenix?
- Peak beam intensity57,600 cd vs 22,500 cd2.6×
- Beam distance (ANSI FL1)480 m vs 300 m+60%
- Maximum runtime235 h vs 152 h+55%
- Weight272 g vs 286 g+5%
Why is TK35UE Fenix better than TK35?
- Maximum output1,300 lm vs 3,200 lm2.5×
- Brightness levels5 vs 6+20%
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 1,300 lm | 3,200 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | 57,600 cd | 22,500 cd |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 480 m | 300 m |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| LED & beam | ||
| LED emitter | Cree XHP35 HI | Cree XHP70 |
| LED maker | Cree | Cree |
| Colour temperature | — | 6,400K |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | 18650 Li-ion, AAA | 18650 Li-ion |
| Maximum runtime | 235 h | 152 h |
| Rechargeable | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C charging | No | — |
| Battery level indicator | — | Yes |
| Size & weight | ||
| Length / height | 159.5 mm | 164.5 mm |
| Head diameter / width | 48 mm | 48 mm |
| Body diameter / depth | 43 mm | 43 mm |
| Weight | 272 g | 286 g |
| Modes & features | ||
| Brightness levels | 5 | 6 |
| Switch | Dual switches | — |
| Strobe | Yes | Yes |
| SOS / beacon | Yes | Yes |
| Lockout | — | Yes |
