- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- TK35 vs UC35 V2.0
Fenix TK35 vs Fenix UC35 V2.0
What TK35 does better (3) and where UC35 V2.0 wins (2) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
TK35UC35 V2.0
| TK35 | UC35 V2.0 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length / height | 159.5 mm | 140 mm | +19.5 mm |
| Head diameter / width | 48 mm | 25.4 mm | +22.6 mm |
| Body diameter / depth | 43 mm | 23.5 mm | +19.5 mm |
| Weight | 272 g | 88 g | +184 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is TK35 better than UC35 V2.0?
- Beam distance (ANSI FL1)480 m vs 266 m+80%
- Peak beam intensity57,600 cd vs 17,690 cd3.3×
- Maximum output1,300 lm vs 1,000 lm+30%
Why is UC35 V2.0 better than TK35?
- Maximum runtime235 h vs 750 h3.2×
- Weight272 g vs 88 g3.1×
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 1,300 lm | 1,000 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | 57,600 cd | 17,690 cd |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 480 m | 266 m |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| LED & beam | ||
| LED emitter | Cree XHP35 HI | Cree XP-L HI |
| LED maker | Cree | Cree |
| Colour temperature | — | 5,700K |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | 18650 Li-ion, AAA | 18650 Li-ion, CR123A, AAA |
| Battery capacity | — | 3,400 mAh |
| Maximum runtime | 235 h | 750 h |
| Rechargeable | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C charging | No | No |
| Battery level indicator | — | Yes |
| Also runs on AA/AAA/CR123A | — | Yes |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | — | IP68 |
| Water protection (IPx) | — | IPx8 |
| Pocket clip | — | Yes |
| Size & weight | ||
| Length / height | 159.5 mm | 140 mm |
| Head diameter / width | 48 mm | 25.4 mm |
| Body diameter / depth | 43 mm | 23.5 mm |
| Weight | 272 g | 88 g |
| Modes & features | ||
| Brightness levels | 5 | — |
| Switch | Dual switches | Dual switches |
| Tactical tail switch (momentary on) | — | Yes |
| Strobe | Yes | Yes |
| SOS / beacon | Yes | — |
| Mode memory | — | Yes |
