How we scoreBlogAdvertise
html›body›main#compare791 models · updated Oct 21, 2026
  1. compoundsemi.com
  2. Compare
  3. TK35 vs DM35

Fenix TK35 vs Imalent DM35

What TK35 does better (3) and where DM35 wins (2) — every spec side by side.

Fenix TK35
Fenix · 2018TK35
6.2Score
3 advantages≈ $110
vs
Imalent DM35
Imalent · 2019DM35
8.6Score
2 advantages≈ $95
Higher score
6.4Brightness & throw6.9
6.5Battery & charging6.9
3.3Build & durability8.5
5.9Features5.9

Why is TK35 better than DM35?

  1. Beam distance (ANSI FL1)480 m vs 450 m+7%
  2. Maximum runtime235 h vs 192 h+22%
  3. Peak beam intensity57,600 cd vs 50,960 cd+13%

Why is DM35 better than TK35?

  1. Weight272 g vs 87 g3.1×
  2. Maximum output1,300 lm vs 2,000 lm+54%
Specifications

Side by side

Fenix TK35Fenix TK35≈ $1106.2
Imalent DM35Imalent DM35≈ $958.6
Light output
Maximum output1,300 lm2,000 lm
Peak beam intensity57,600 cd50,960 cd
Beam distance (ANSI FL1)480 m450 m
Light sourceLEDLED
LED & beam
LED emitterCree XHP35 HICree XHP
LED makerCreeCree
Battery & charging
Battery18650 Li-ion, AAA21700 Li-ion, AAA
Battery capacity—5,000 mAh
Maximum runtime235 h192 h
RechargeableYesYes
USB-C chargingNoNo
Build & durability
Submersible to—2 m
Impact resistance (drop)—1.5 m
Body material—Aluminium
Magnetic tail / base—Yes
Pocket clip—Yes
Can tail-stand—Yes
Size & weight
Length / height159.5 mm—
Head diameter / width48 mm—
Body diameter / depth43 mm—
Weight272 g87 g
Modes & features
Brightness levels5—
SwitchDual switches—
StrobeYes—
SOS / beaconYes—
Red light—Yes
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare