- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- TK35 vs MH25 V2
Fenix TK35 vs Nitecore MH25 V2
What TK35 does better (1) and where MH25 V2 wins (2) — every spec side by side.
Why is TK35 better than MH25 V2?
- Peak beam intensity57,600 cd vs 56,410 cd+2%
Why is MH25 V2 better than TK35?
- Maximum runtime235 h vs 1,500 h6.4×
- USB-C chargingNo · TK35: Yes
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 1,300 lm | 1,300 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | 57,600 cd | 56,410 cd |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 480 m | 475 m |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| LED & beam | ||
| LED emitter | Cree XHP35 HI | — |
| LED maker | Cree | — |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | 18650 Li-ion, AAA | 21700 Li-ion, 18650 Li-ion, CR123A |
| Battery capacity | — | 5,000 mAh |
| Maximum runtime | 235 h | 1,500 h |
| Rechargeable | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C charging | No | Yes |
| Also runs on AA/AAA/CR123A | — | Yes |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | — | IP68 |
| Water protection (IPx) | — | IPx8 |
| Submersible to | — | 2 m |
| Impact resistance (drop) | — | 1 m |
| Body material | — | Aluminium |
| Pocket clip | — | Yes |
| Size & weight | ||
| Length / height | 159.5 mm | — |
| Head diameter / width | 48 mm | — |
| Body diameter / depth | 43 mm | — |
| Weight | 272 g | — |
| Modes & features | ||
| Brightness levels | 5 | — |
| Switch | Dual switches | Side switch |
| Strobe | Yes | Yes |
| SOS / beacon | Yes | Yes |
