- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- WF11E Intrinsically Safe vs MH10 V2
Fenix WF11E Intrinsically Safe vs Nitecore MH10 V2
What WF11E Intrinsically Safe does better (0) and where MH10 V2 wins (5) — every spec side by side.
vs
2.9Brightness & throw3.9
3.6Build & durability7.8
5.9Features5.9
Why is WF11E Intrinsically Safe better than MH10 V2?
WF11E Intrinsically Safe has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Why is MH10 V2 better than WF11E Intrinsically Safe?
- Maximum output200 lm vs 1,200 lm6×
- Maximum runtime70 h vs 1,488 h21.3×
- Beam distance (ANSI FL1)185 m vs 201 m+9%
- Peak beam intensity8,560 cd vs 10,100 cd+18%
- Water protection (IPx)IPx7 vs IPx8+14%
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 200 lm | 1,200 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | 8,560 cd | 10,100 cd |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 185 m | 201 m |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| LED & beam | ||
| LED emitter | Cree XP-G2 | — |
| LED maker | Cree | — |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | AA | 21700 Li-ion |
| Battery capacity | — | 4,000 mAh |
| Maximum runtime | 70 h | 1,488 h |
| Rechargeable | — | Yes |
| USB-C charging | — | Yes |
| Also runs on AA/AAA/CR123A | — | Yes |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | IP67 | IPX8 |
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx7 | IPx8 |
| Impact resistance (drop) | 1 m | — |
| Body material | — | Aluminium |
| Magnetic tail / base | Yes | — |
| Pocket clip | Yes | Yes |
| Size & weight | ||
| Length / height | 167.5 mm | — |
| Head diameter / width | 49 mm | — |
| Body diameter / depth | 24 mm | — |
| Weight | 159 g | — |
| Modes & features | ||
| Brightness levels | 3 | — |
| Strobe | — | Yes |
| SOS / beacon | — | Yes |
| Mode memory | — | Yes |
Related comparisons
vs
Fenix WF11E Intrinsically SafevsLedlenser P7 Core4.04.0vs
Fenix WF11E Intrinsically SafevsLedlenser i9 CRI4.03.7vs
Fenix WF11E Intrinsically SafevsMaglite ML300LX-S20164.04.1vs
Fenix WF11E Intrinsically SafevsWuben T103 Provs
Fenix WF11E Intrinsically SafevsWuben TO46R4.04.0
vs
Nitecore MH10 V2vsNitecore MH25 V26.67.8