- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- WF30RE Intrinsically Safe vs E52C
Fenix WF30RE Intrinsically Safe vs Nextorch E52C
What WF30RE Intrinsically Safe does better (1) and where E52C wins (4) — every spec side by side.
vs
2.8Brightness & throw5.0
9.2Battery & charging5.7
5.6Build & durability7.1
5.9Features5.9
Dimensions
Size comparison
WF30RE Intrinsically SafeE52C
| WF30RE Intrinsically Safe | E52C | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length / height | 150.5 mm | 153 mm | −2.5 mm |
| Head diameter / width | 34 mm | 30 mm | +4 mm |
| Weight | 215 g | 130 g | +85 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is WF30RE Intrinsically Safe better than E52C?
- Maximum runtime120 h vs 65 h+85%
Why is E52C better than WF30RE Intrinsically Safe?
- Maximum output280 lm vs 3,000 lm10.7×
- Weight215 g vs 130 g+65%
- Beam distance (ANSI FL1)170 m vs 210 m+24%
- Peak beam intensity7,220 cd vs 11,025 cd+53%
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 280 lm | 3,000 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | 7,220 cd | 11,025 cd |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 170 m | 210 m |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| LED & beam | ||
| LED emitter | Cree XP-G2 | — |
| LED maker | Cree | — |
| Colour temperature | 4,800K | — |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | Built-in Li-ion / Li-Po | 21700 Li-ion |
| Maximum runtime | 120 h | 65 h |
| Rechargeable | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C charging | — | Yes |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | IP68 | IPX8 |
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx8 |
| Body material | — | Aluminium |
| Pocket clip | — | Yes |
| Size & weight | ||
| Length / height | 150.5 mm | 153 mm |
| Head diameter / width | 34 mm | 30 mm |
| Body diameter / depth | 28 mm | — |
| Weight | 215 g | 130 g |
| Modes & features | ||
| Brightness levels | 3 | — |
| Strobe | Yes | — |
