- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- WT16R vs WT25R
Fenix WT16R vs Fenix WT25R
What WT16R does better (2) and where WT25R wins (2) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
WT16RWT25R
| WT16R | WT25R | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length / height | 127 mm | 135.3 mm | −8.3 mm |
| Head diameter / width | 37 mm | 29 mm | +8 mm |
| Weight | 129 g | 137 g | −8 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is WT16R better than WT25R?
- Weight129 g vs 137 g+6%
- Maximum runtime30 h vs 29 h+3%
Why is WT25R better than WT16R?
- Maximum output300 lm vs 1,000 lm3.3×
- Beam distance (ANSI FL1)115 m vs 220 m+91%
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 300 lm | 1,000 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | 3,310 cd | — |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 115 m | 220 m |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| LED & beam | ||
| LED emitter | Cree XP-E2 | — |
| LED maker | Cree | — |
| Number of LEDs | 2 | — |
| Colour temperature | 5,800K | — |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | Built-in Li-ion / Li-Po | Built-in Li-ion / Li-Po |
| Number of batteries | — | 1 |
| Maximum runtime | 30 h | 29 h |
| Rechargeable | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C charging | Yes | — |
| Battery level indicator | Yes | — |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | IP66 | — |
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx4 | IPx4 |
| Pocket clip | Yes | — |
| Size & weight | ||
| Length / height | 127 mm | 135.3 mm |
| Head diameter / width | 37 mm | 29 mm |
| Body diameter / depth | 26 mm | — |
| Weight | 129 g | 137 g |
| Modes & features | ||
| Brightness levels | 3 | — |
| Strobe | — | Yes |
| SOS / beacon | — | Yes |
| Mode memory | Yes | — |
| Colours | Black | Black |
