- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- EOS 32LRZ vs Shark
Mares EOS 32LRZ vs Oceama Shark
What EOS 32LRZ does better (2) and where Shark wins (2) — every spec side by side.
Why is EOS 32LRZ better than Shark?
- Maximum runtime4.4 h vs 1.5 h2.9×
- Submersible to120 m vs 100 m+20%
Why is Shark better than EOS 32LRZ?
- Maximum output930 lm vs 2,500 lm2.7×
- Weight605 g vs 496 g+22%
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 930 lm | 2,500 lm |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| LED & beam | ||
| LED emitter | — | Cree XHP50.2 |
| LED maker | — | Cree |
| Number of LEDs | 1 | — |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | — | 26650 Li-ion |
| Battery capacity | — | 5,000 mAh |
| Maximum runtime | 4.4 h | 1.5 h |
| Rechargeable | — | Yes |
| Charging time | 7 h | — |
| Build & durability | ||
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx8 |
| Submersible to | 120 m | 100 m |
| Body material | Aluminium | Aluminium |
| Size & weight | ||
| Length / height | 225 mm | 200 mm |
| Head diameter / width | 34 mm | — |
| Weight | 605 g | 496 g |
| Modes & features | ||
| SOS / beacon | — | Yes |
| Colours | Silver | Black |
