How we scoreBlogAdvertise
html›body›main#compare791 models · updated Oct 21, 2026
  1. compoundsemi.com
  2. Compare
  3. Shark vs SZ 5000

Oceama Shark vs Seac SZ 5000

What Shark does better (0) and where SZ 5000 wins (3) — every spec side by side.

Oceama Shark
Oceama · 2024Shark
8.4Score
0 advantages≈ $260
vs
Seac SZ 5000
Seac · 2024SZ 5000
9.6Score
3 advantages≈ $240
Higher score
8.8Brightness & throw9.4
4.3Battery & charging7.8

Why is Shark better than SZ 5000?

Shark has no measurable advantages in this pair.

Why is SZ 5000 better than Shark?

  1. Maximum output2,500 lm vs 4,200 lm+68%
  2. Maximum runtime1.5 h vs 2.5 h+67%
  3. Battery capacity5,000 mAh vs 7,800 mAh+56%
Specifications

Side by side

Oceama SharkOceama Shark≈ $2608.4
Seac SZ 5000Seac SZ 5000≈ $2409.6
Light output
Maximum output2,500 lm4,200 lm
Light sourceLEDLED
LED & beam
LED emitterCree XHP50.2—
LED makerCree—
Battery & charging
Battery26650 Li-ionBuilt-in Li-ion / Li-Po
Battery capacity5,000 mAh7,800 mAh
Maximum runtime1.5 h2.5 h
RechargeableYesYes
Build & durability
Water protection (IPx)IPx8—
Submersible to100 m—
Body materialAluminiumAluminium
Size & weight
Length / height200 mm—
Weight496 g—
Modes & features
SOS / beaconYes—
ColoursBlackBlack
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare