How we scoreBlogAdvertise
html›body›main#compare791 models · updated Oct 21, 2026
  1. compoundsemi.com
  2. Compare
  3. Shark vs Sea Dragon Mini 1300S Power

Oceama Shark vs SeaLife Sea Dragon Mini 1300S Power

What Shark does better (2) and where Sea Dragon Mini 1300S Power wins (1) — every spec side by side.

Oceama Shark
Oceama · 2024Shark
8.4Score
2 advantages≈ $260
Higher score
vs
SeaLife Sea Dragon Mini 1300S Power
8.2Score
1 advantage≈ $190
8.8Brightness & throw6.6
4.3Battery & charging5.0
3.1Build & durability8.7
5.9Features5.9

Why is Shark better than Sea Dragon Mini 1300S Power?

  1. Maximum output2,500 lm vs 1,300 lm+92%
  2. Battery capacity5,000 mAh vs 2,600 mAh+92%

Why is Sea Dragon Mini 1300S Power better than Shark?

  1. Weight496 g vs 174 g2.9×
Specifications

Side by side

Oceama SharkOceama Shark≈ $2608.4
Light output
Maximum output2,500 lm1,300 lm
Light sourceLEDLED
LED & beam
LED emitterCree XHP50.2—
LED makerCree—
Battery & charging
Battery26650 Li-ion18650 Li-ion
Battery capacity5,000 mAh2,600 mAh
Maximum runtime1.5 h—
RechargeableYesYes
Build & durability
Water protection (IPx)IPx8IPx8
Submersible to100 m100 m
Body materialAluminiumAluminium
Size & weight
Length / height200 mm—
Weight496 g174 g
Modes & features
SOS / beaconYesYes
ColoursBlackRed, Black
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare