- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- 779.CBTPB vs LD42
Facom 779.CBTPB vs Fenix LD42
What 779.CBTPB does better (0) and where LD42 wins (4) — every spec side by side.
Why is 779.CBTPB better than LD42?
779.CBTPB has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Why is LD42 better than 779.CBTPB?
- Maximum runtime51 h vs 130.3 h2.6×
- Beam distance (ANSI FL1)233 m vs 350 m+50%
- Weight176 g vs 99 g+78%
- Maximum output309 lm vs 350 lm+13%
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 309 lm | 350 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | — | 30,620 cd |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 233 m | 350 m |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | AAA | AA |
| Maximum runtime | 51 h | 130.3 h |
| Rechargeable | No | — |
| Build & durability | ||
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx4 | — |
| Body material | — | Aluminium |
| Pocket clip | — | Yes |
| Size & weight | ||
| Length / height | — | 159.5 mm |
| Head diameter / width | — | 34 mm |
| Body diameter / depth | — | 32.5 mm |
| Weight | 176 g | 99 g |
| Modes & features | ||
| Brightness levels | — | 5 |
| Switch | — | Rotary / scroll wheel |
| Colours | Black | — |
