- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- 779.CBTPB vs WT16R
Facom 779.CBTPB vs Fenix WT16R
What 779.CBTPB does better (3) and where WT16R wins (2) — every spec side by side.
Why is 779.CBTPB better than WT16R?
- Beam distance (ANSI FL1)233 m vs 115 m2×
- Maximum runtime51 h vs 30 h+70%
- Maximum output309 lm vs 300 lm+3%
Why is WT16R better than 779.CBTPB?
- Weight176 g vs 129 g+36%
- RechargeableNo · 779.CBTPB: Yes
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 309 lm | 300 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | — | 3,310 cd |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 233 m | 115 m |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| LED & beam | ||
| LED emitter | — | Cree XP-E2 |
| LED maker | — | Cree |
| Number of LEDs | — | 2 |
| Colour temperature | — | 5,800K |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | AAA | Built-in Li-ion / Li-Po |
| Maximum runtime | 51 h | 30 h |
| Rechargeable | No | Yes |
| USB-C charging | — | Yes |
| Battery level indicator | — | Yes |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | — | IP66 |
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx4 | IPx4 |
| Pocket clip | — | Yes |
| Size & weight | ||
| Length / height | — | 127 mm |
| Head diameter / width | — | 37 mm |
| Body diameter / depth | — | 26 mm |
| Weight | 176 g | 129 g |
| Modes & features | ||
| Brightness levels | — | 3 |
| Mode memory | — | Yes |
| Colours | Black | Black |
