- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- 779.CBTPB vs WT25R
Facom 779.CBTPB vs Fenix WT25R
What 779.CBTPB does better (2) and where WT25R wins (3) — every spec side by side.
Why is 779.CBTPB better than WT25R?
- Maximum runtime51 h vs 29 h+76%
- Beam distance (ANSI FL1)233 m vs 220 m+6%
Why is WT25R better than 779.CBTPB?
- Maximum output309 lm vs 1,000 lm3.2×
- Weight176 g vs 137 g+28%
- RechargeableNo · 779.CBTPB: Yes
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 309 lm | 1,000 lm |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 233 m | 220 m |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | AAA | Built-in Li-ion / Li-Po |
| Number of batteries | — | 1 |
| Maximum runtime | 51 h | 29 h |
| Rechargeable | No | Yes |
| Build & durability | ||
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx4 | IPx4 |
| Size & weight | ||
| Length / height | — | 135.3 mm |
| Head diameter / width | — | 29 mm |
| Weight | 176 g | 137 g |
| Modes & features | ||
| Strobe | — | Yes |
| SOS / beacon | — | Yes |
| Colours | Black | Black |
