- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- 779.CBTPB vs UB18DJLL0Z
Facom 779.CBTPB vs Hikoki UB18DJLL0Z
What 779.CBTPB does better (0) and where UB18DJLL0Z wins (1) — every spec side by side.
vs
4.2Battery & charging5.7
Why is 779.CBTPB better than UB18DJLL0Z?
779.CBTPB has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Why is UB18DJLL0Z better than 779.CBTPB?
- RechargeableNo · 779.CBTPB: Yes
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 309 lm | — |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 233 m | — |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| LED & beam | ||
| Number of LEDs | — | 12 |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | AAA | Built-in Li-ion / Li-Po |
| Number of batteries | — | 1 |
| Maximum runtime | 51 h | 51 h |
| Rechargeable | No | Yes |
| Build & durability | ||
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx4 | — |
| Size & weight | ||
| Length / height | — | 205 mm |
| Head diameter / width | — | 78 mm |
| Weight | 176 g | — |
| Modes & features | ||
| Colours | Black | Green, Black |
